"Bill McKee" wrote in message
nk.net...

"NobodyYouKnow" wrote in message
The "did not" response is typical of children who cannot give arguments
or
rational explanations for their fantasies. The facts under discussion
would
require actually referencing the science or at least an authoritative
condensation such as http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/index.htm.



And the first part of the summary negates the complete paper!

"Projects scenarios of future climate change using a wide range of models
of future emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols"

The total focus is on greenhouse gases and aerosols. Not what is the
actual global warming and what are the causes. There is no mention of sun
activity, or ocean temp cycles (El Ninos, La Ninas), Magnetic field
affects. Is a biased report. If you did that in university, you would not
receive an A.

I must say, Bill, that is remarkably lame.
Here's the TOC:

1 The Climate System: an Overview
2 Observed Climate Variability and Change
3 The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
4 Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases
5 Aerosols, their Direct and Indirect Effects
6 Radiative Forcing of Climate Change
7 Physical Climate Processes and Feedbacks
8 Model Evaluation
9 Projections of Future Climate Change
10 Regional Climate Information – Evaluation and Projections
11 Changes in Sea Level
12 Detection of Climate Change and Attribution of Causes
13 Climate Scenario Development
14 Advancing Our Understanding


--
Coby Beck
(remove #\Space "coby 101 @ bigpond . com")