In article et,
"Bill McKee" wrote:

"Lloyd Parker" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Bill McKee" wrote:

"NobodyYouKnow" wrote in message
m...
Bill McKee wrote:
"Coby Beck" wrote in message I have presented
references to all the best scientific organizations that
deal with climate. You don't read it, call it "junk science" and
then tell *me* that *my* mind is locked?? Very rich...

--
Coby Beck
(remove #\Space "coby 101 @ bigpond . com")



As I repeat, if it was so simple

Not simple, but definitive.

then there would be no argument on
the causes of Global Warming.

There aren't. Most of the debate in the sciences is in the effect on
climate, since there has been little doubt of the warming or the causes.


Wrong, big time.


Bill, you are not a scientist. A number of us here are, including myself.
Check out the scientific literature, check out the scientific agencies and
groups. There really is no debate about the cause.

Actually I am scientifically trained. My degrees are in engineering,

As I said, you're no scientist. Engineering is no more science than a car
mechanic is an automotive engineer.

and
bioengineering. If you are a scientist, you are incompetent. The Kyoto
group were all "scientists" The sciences of Psychology, etc.

You are lying. Look at the scientific literature. And are you claiming the
National Academy of Sciences is incompetent? NASA?