wrote:
Much snippage below


On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:08:13 GMT, "none" wrote:


"Gene Cottrell" wrote in message
...
Before writing to the NPS, I suggest that you read the whole change
document.


I didn't have time to read the whole document yet, but so far I've only seen
things that improve the conservation of our National Parks.

Read it, and make up your own mind, don't take someone elses word for it,
and make a horse's ass out of yourself.

Gene Cottrell


You have read the entire document then and have the expertise to fully
comprehend the legal wording and the full impact those changes have on the
NPS? I'm impressed - considering that some of the best legal minds in the
country are wrestling over those very words.

You may want to read this opinion before saying the document changes are for
the better.

http://www.georgewright.org/ Click on the link for the PDF file - top,
center.

I did not read the entire 296 pages of the comparative summary written by
NPS but only about 100 pages but I certainly got the flavor.

Bob S.

Hmmm...lessee here...as of my reply, none of the prior posters had read
the entire thing, one alleges that some of the best legal minds are
wrestling over it and tacitly admits that he doesn't understand it (but
claims that he "got the flavor"), and all offered their opinions and/or
the opinions of others that give partisan support to their announced
opinion as "the only real truth of the matter." However, all indicate
that it must be read for oneself to really understand it and form an
objective opinion, while simultaneously claiming that the thence-gained
understanding can only result in agreement with their opinion (which, by
their own stated "rules," would have been formed prematurely and without
complete understanding).

Fellas, if y'all aren't semi-retired. marginally successful civil
litigators now devoted to your positions in major political party
leadership roles, you've missed your calling...thankfully...

...and ya just gotta love the premise that bureaucrats are gonna ****
things up by not allowing more bureaucracy to oversee the bureaucrats
trying to **** up the bureaucracy by cutting down on bureaucracy...

Well, good luck and all,
R

All you gotta know is that Bush is doing it. If it's being done by a
lying cheating thief it's a lying cheating dihonest act. If it looks
like a duck, quacks etc.
The parks were intended to preserve areas not to give fat aggie
fratboys a place to ride their snowmobiles and suvs while eating
corndogs and drinking slurplies.