Thread: ROFF history
View Single Post
  #65  
Old July 19th, 2006, 10:21 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly
Mr. Opus McDopus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 151
Default ROFF history


wrote in message
...
In article , says...


Oddly enough I believe I answered every question you asked


So I take it that neither you nor Sandy Poo, have no knowledge of homosexual
couples adopting children (If you think real hard or look back in the thread
a bit, you see that I asked you about adoption in the state in which you
reside). Hell, beyond adoption, there are homosexuals that were formerly
married to folks of the opposite sex and who had children during those
marriages--remember, this thread started with Sandy Poo's contention that if
Wolfgang were a homosexual, he wouldn't have any children--according to you,
anyway--that could read what Wolfgang posted to ROFF ten year previous.

....until it
became evident that you can't read.


If I can't read, why are we continuing to carry on this little war of words?

What's that quote about arguing
with an idiot?


Not being an idiot, I wouldn't have the slightest idea. I'm sure you'll
remeber it before too long though!

That others may not be able to tell the difference?


Are you and other?

You're illustrating the difference very well now and I'll happily let
you continue. Please continue on this thread.


By all means, I wouldn't want anyone to think I was conversing by myself
here.

But anyway, I digress. You like surveys, show me one person (besides
the other brain-dead inDUHvidual who can't read) who honestly thinks
that I misread "in a box on my shelf" as anything other than deceased.


Ah...Ken, we seem to be shy anyone else who gives a rats ass about the pride
expressed by my father's ashes.

And, if you are going to quote someone, it's best to get it right. I said,
"...on a shelf, in a box..." You see, the purpose of the quotation marks is
to show that *you* are quoting *exactly* what someone else has said--to the
letter. It's an English language elements of style thingy that you probably
don't really understand. You might wish to purchase yourself a copy of:
The Elements of Style, William Strunk, Jr. & E. B. White
http://tinyurl.com/2rqkg .

There you go with that name callin' again. What was it you said about
callin' people names?


Not sure I said anything about name calling.


Well, I believe that we established that your memory was fading, in an
earlier thread. Go back to the thread involving 'ol Joey and check out your
response to Cyli.

I generally try really
really hard not to do it, I don't think it reflects well on the author.


Now your just lyin'!

However under certain circumstances, like when attempting to communicate
via the written word with someone who can't read, it does provide a
degree of relief.


I'm sure it does you a great deal of good.

I, generally, call folks name that fit them best. Moron, seems to fit you
like a glove!

Love,
Op


- Ken