In article ,
says...

wrote in message
...
In article , says...
....until it
became evident that you can't read.

If I can't read, why are we continuing to carry on this little war of words?

I'm just letting you expose your ignorance. I'm not sure why you are
cooperating.

Are you and other?

Oh no, do we have to start in on writing ability now. I didn't snip
anything from this sentence. It's 100% yours and there was no context.
Beautiful example of your coherence.


But anyway, I digress. You like surveys, show me one person (besides
the other brain-dead inDUHvidual who can't read) who honestly thinks
that I misread "in a box on my shelf" as anything other than deceased.

Ah...Ken, we seem to be shy anyone else who gives a rats ass about the pride
expressed by my father's ashes.

Once again, I'm not sure what your jumble of words is supposed to mean.
"we seem to be shy anyone else..." Classic.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that you think that no one
wants to agree with you because we are scaring them away?

I'd wager it's because it's stupid, pointless, and you are wrong.
Nevertheless, no one has agreed with you.



Not sure I said anything about name calling.

Well, I believe that we established that your memory was fading, in an
earlier thread. Go back to the thread involving 'ol Joey and check out your
response to Cyli.

You want me to go do your homework for you? No thanks. Besides, my bet
is that you are reading something wrong. My guess is that you are
misreading the word "That" and are attributing it to the wrong concept.


I generally try really
really hard not to do it, I don't think it reflects well on the author.

Now your just lyin'!

Straight out of the Wolfgang playbook. If your (or you're) argument is
failing, call your opponent a liar.

I've been posting to ROFF for probably ~12 years now. I've had some
heated arguments and I'm sure if you dig through Deja/Google you'll be
able to find some quotes where I call someone a name. I'm sure you'll
use this evidence along with your misreading (yes again) with what I
wrote above to say that I'm a liar. But hey, if it keeps you occupied
searching through archives, have at it. Hint: Look for "Halfordian"
and "janikk" in the same post, that's your best bet.

Tootles,
- Ken