Ken Fortenberry typed:
rw wrote:
Multiple choice -- Will Fortenberry:

(a) be the laughingstock of ROFF
(b) pretend nothing happened and that he's right, goddamnit
(c) disappear in shame, never to be heard from again
(d) none of the above
(e) all of the above
(f) admit he's wrong

I'm gonna guess (d).

.. . . and I would expect nothing less. What is probably most interesting (to
me) is that Ken has proven himself to be one of the most powerful people on
Usenet. With merely a few flicks of the wrist, he has caused many people to
travel to a spot that they probably otherwise would not have gone. It was
proven last year, at least to my satisfaction, that Fawn Lake does indeed
exist and is a nice looking spot. I'm anxious to see the fish photos, and
I'd like to get out there myself. But. . .

This said, I'm looking forward to next year's trip report, whereupon five
more witnesses will hike to and fish this nice looking spot, and Ken will
again state Fawn Lake is nothing but a soggy patch of weeds despite all
evidence to the contrary.

We now return to your regularly scheduled debate. . .
--
TL,
Tim
-------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj