Charlie Choc wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:08:50 -0600, rw wrote:


Ken Fortenberry wrote:

If Jeffie really wanted to convince someone he wouldn't rely
on digital photos. I mean, c'mon.

Next year he should go armed with a real film camera and a GPS
unit. If the GPS unit isn't doctored and the negative of the
photo is unretouched that should prove that the photo of both
the readout on the GPS unit and the so-called Fawn Lake are
where he says it is. Naturally, I'd want to inspect both the
GPS unit and the negative.

You wouldn't admit the truth if someone bound and gagged you, dragged
you to Fawn Lake behind a horse, and shoved a live 14" brook trout up
your ass.


Interesting that YNP has special fishing regs for a non-existent un-fishable
patch of weeds: http://www.nps.gov/yell/planvisit/to...g/arearegs.htm.

Right. Make it a 12" brook trout. It will go in (nose-first) easier but
still have a hard time coming out. :-)

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.