View Single Post
  #5  
Old September 25th, 2003, 09:50 AM
Finn Haug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sage 796 XP and 796 SLT

1 pound is 0.454 kg.
Just now I feel going for the XP.

Finn


"Bill Kiene" skrev i melding
y.com...
Does 2.54 kg = 1 pound?

The XP is fast but the SLT is not slow. Just a little less power.

I like both series?

If I am looking for maximum distance, I would go for the XP.

If not, I like casting the SLT better.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com

"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi Bill,
Yes, the XP is really powerful! Well, I will be fishing mostly in rivers
with fishsize between 1.0 kg and 4-5 kg. Ocassionally fishes between 5

and
10 kg. With floating line only, sometimes with an intermediate leader.

Im
a
bit attracted to the medium fast aktion as the SLT, but Im afraid that

its
too soft. With these spesifications, could an SLT be recommended?

Finn Haug




"Bill Kiene" skrev i melding
m...
Hi Finn,

The SLT is maybe 10% softer/lighter and is for those who want a rod

that
is
not as stiff/powerful as an XP.

For bigger flies, larger water and larger fish, I would advise on the

XP
for
most.

--
Bill Kiene

Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com

"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi,
Im looking for a rod for trout- and salmonfishing in rivers. I've

tried
XP
and its a lovely rod. Unfortunately Ive have not been able to come

over
a
SLT 796 yet. They all say this is a lovely rod to cast, but perhaps

to
soft
for salmon and big troutfishing. Does someone have experiences with

both
these rods? Ill be happy for opinions on this.

Sincerely
Finn Haug