
September 25th, 2003, 09:50 AM
|
|
Sage 796 XP and 796 SLT
1 pound is 0.454 kg.
Just now I feel going for the XP.
Finn
"Bill Kiene" skrev i melding
y.com...
Does 2.54 kg = 1 pound?
The XP is fast but the SLT is not slow. Just a little less power.
I like both series?
If I am looking for maximum distance, I would go for the XP.
If not, I like casting the SLT better.
--
Bill Kiene
Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com
"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi Bill,
Yes, the XP is really powerful! Well, I will be fishing mostly in rivers
with fishsize between 1.0 kg and 4-5 kg. Ocassionally fishes between 5
and
10 kg. With floating line only, sometimes with an intermediate leader.
Im
a
bit attracted to the medium fast aktion as the SLT, but Im afraid that
its
too soft. With these spesifications, could an SLT be recommended?
Finn Haug
"Bill Kiene" skrev i melding
m...
Hi Finn,
The SLT is maybe 10% softer/lighter and is for those who want a rod
that
is
not as stiff/powerful as an XP.
For bigger flies, larger water and larger fish, I would advise on the
XP
for
most.
--
Bill Kiene
Kiene's Fly Shop
Sacramento, CA
www.kiene.com
"Finn Haug" wrote in message
...
Hi,
Im looking for a rod for trout- and salmonfishing in rivers. I've
tried
XP
and its a lovely rod. Unfortunately Ive have not been able to come
over
a
SLT 796 yet. They all say this is a lovely rod to cast, but perhaps
to
soft
for salmon and big troutfishing. Does someone have experiences with
both
these rods? Ill be happy for opinions on this.
Sincerely
Finn Haug
|