On 22 Oct 2006 09:16:50 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:

....death, taxes, and Wolfgang...

wrote:
On 22 Oct 2006 08:05:01 -0700, "Wolfgang" wrote:


wrote:

...Bottom line is that economics keeps a lot of material out, regs keeps
just about anything else potentially harmful out, and in the end, what
is used _generally_ would be environmentally neutral.

Horse****, pure and simple.

No, it isn't.

Yes, it is.

As a compulsive liar with a store of ignorance truly staggering in both
breadth and depth, it has probably occurred to you that in any given
instance your audience can never tell for sure in what proportions
these major components of your persona are operating. What evidently
continues to escape you entirely, despite it's being pointed out to you
repeatedly, is that it really doesn't matter.

Are talking to yourself, me, or someone else?

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

See, that's what we love about this place......cleverness on a scale
that would make Parker, Twain and Wilde blush with envy.

It might occur to the more-intelligent and observant that I've no
problem coming right out and stating what I don't know,

It has doubtless occurred to all and sundry that you have no problem at
all stating what you don't know. Most, dimly comprehended rules of
grammar notwithstanding, will probably experience little difficulty in
deciding which side of the ambiguity to jump on.

just as I've no problem stating what I do know.

Well, we can only speculate on how much trouble it would cost you, but
we are certain that it wouldn't take long. Hell, for all we know you
may have slipped it in somewhere at just about any point in any of the
myriad bits of inane **** you've posted here over the years. Tell you
what......why don't you just post it again, clearly labeled, so
everyone can make a note of it. That way you can be assured that we'll
all remember and you can leave, secure in the knowledge that everybody
will know all that you know. As a bonus (and as should be obvious now)
everyone will then know that you actually know TWO things!

If it's based strictly on my experience(s), I'll qualify it as appropriate.

Hm......

Based on the extensive and exquisitely detailed resumé you've provided
here over the years, I'm sure we'd all agree that no sort of
qualifications need be (or will be) forthcoming.

And in the instant case,
I'm confident that my knowledge and experience when it comes to
wrecking/breaking yards, automotive/industrial/equipment recycling, and
related activities exceeds yours,

Well, being confident is sort of implicit in confidentiality, ainna?
One supposes that pretty much sums up the point of being El Mysterioso.

and my suspicion is that it does so greatly....

Actually, you're a liar.

and no, YMMWNV...

Oh yeah? Well, JSDFIDHBWPWUBNF! HAH!

Wolfgang
"environmentally neutral"......crack me up!

Yeah, we wouldn't want to go putting carbon- and ore-based materials in
the ground...

Absolutely priceless!

Dickie

Damned if you do......and double damned if you don't. Sucks, don't it?

Wolfgang
let's see now.......what shall we have it call itself NEXT year?


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....