On 2 Dec 2006 18:23:01 -0800, "riverman" wrote:


wrote:

Those putting their faith for change or "reform" in
Clinton-Pelosi-Schumer type "Dems" are going to be in for a serious
disappointment, and on a number of levels. Thus far, they've attempted
to put an "unindicted co-conspirator" and an impeached-and-removed
Federal Judge-turned-Congressman into leadership roles, backtracked on
the 9/11 Commission promises because of what it might to do _specific_
Dems power (_not_ control) in various committees, etc. And if they
attempt to backpedal and start all sorts of "investigations," they'll
really take it up the ass. Or rather, they'll really cause the entire
Dem party to take it up the ass. Even many real, honest liberal Dems
are cringing. Whining that a turd like Tom DeLay and his ilk are bad
and cheering a turd like Pelosi and her ilk as good is nothing but
hypocritical partisanship.


Its remarkable how much the 110th Congress can be held accountable for
doing or not doing, when they HAVEN'T EVEN CONVENED YET.

Give them a chance before you cast your judgement, eh?

Ri-i-i-i-ght...so if they take bribes _now_, it's OK...well, er, OK.

I haven't cast judgment on what their future actions may or may not be,
I've only expressed my opinion as to what the consequences of the
actions they've already taken might be.

HTH,
R