"rb608" wrote in message
oups.com...
Wolfgang wrote:

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I wuz gonna say the same thing, but I didn't want to plagiarize. :-)

Joe F.


Rah Dean has a point here. I mean, Hillary wouldn't want to make the same
social function faux pas as Laura Bush, showing up at the x-mass tree
lighting in the same dress as three other women. So it is only natural that
she would have the NSA keep tabs on Princess Di and any other women that she
might meet socially.

Of course, there is the fact that Hillary wears the pants in the Clinton
family; and therefore, was unlikely to show-up at any social function
wearing the same dress as an other woman at the function?

Rah Dean's statement, "the agencies involved would have only been doing such
as that with the knowledge that the Bush Administration would naturally want
them to supposedly ignore the US Constitution...," is absolutely correct and
I for one would like to commend him for finally coming to grips with the
fact, *there is no U.S. Constitution, as far as the Bush administration is
concerned*.

Op