wrote:

First, people cannot be "taught evolution" or "intelligent design," they
can only be informed about them (or "taught _about_ them, if you
prefer).

Do you take yourself seriously? I mean after typing the above, can you?
Like your "clarification" made any difference to anything at all?

That said, I agree that people should be "taught" about both,
as well as about religion. I don't think "intelligent design" is the
way life came about and evolution is the more-reasonable explanation,
but I'm certainly aware of both, and I'd make sure my children were as
well. And I think you'll find that most voters would want their kids as
well-educated as possible, and many of those would truly believe that
intelligent design is the more-reasonable explanation.

So let's say clearly what you mean: to be well educated you must be
"informed about" ID. I bet McCain never says that, ever ... I mean
they're kicking school boards out in that blue of blue states, Kansas
for pushing ID. What's sad is that McCain is pandering, but God knows
what you're doing. You may actually believe what you write. Let me be
clear: I've seen the greatest minds of my generation and they don't know
**** about Intelligent Design.


Giuliano is polling better then McCain right now.

"Giuliano"...was that the guy in the porno with Paris Hilton, or the guy
Tony, Bruce Springsteen's guitar player, and the guy with the
Fraankenschteen's Bride hairdo whacked in the season finale of the
Sopranos?


Someone's just seen Britney's summer do. We get it. I thought you
would've got a Harvey Wallbanger reference in too ... try putting ~ in
front of the word in Google next time ... and for my part, I won't trust
TB's spell checker quite so readily.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com