"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
et...
rb608 wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
I can only conclude he's having a bit of
fun with this troll but I don't for one second take it, or him,
seriously on this.

I cannot be as magnanimous. Having a bit of fun with this one?
Perhaps; who knows? Either he's serious, which makes him an idiot
(IMHO), or he's not, which makes this another episode in a long
string of trolls that garners no respect from me. For me, his
stupidity, or lack thereof, is inconsequential. Any other regular on
this forum has no problem with clearly stating their opinion and
position without speaking in questions, hypotheticals, qualifiers,
insults, and innuendos. The fact that you are not sure of his opinion
or motivation even after his presence here for years is testament to
his utter failure to actually say something about who he is and where
he stands beyond an obvious delight in his role as resident sociopath.
YMMV, of course.

My M does V, mainly because my wife has met Richard and reports
that he is gracious, eloquent, generous and real. I do agree that
he appears to take an obvious delight in being a contrarian and a
resident sociopath. But I don't for one second believe that he
would really want Intelligent Design to be taught as science in
our public schools, that's gotta be just a troll.

Not surprisingly, you miss the point entirely. dicklet has seen to it that
whether he is serious or trolling or whatever is as irrelevant as it is
uninteresting. Like you, he has made himself into a plaything. That's
o.k......the world needs more cheap, amusing, and unbreakable toys.

Wolfgang