On 1 Mar 2007 15:49:24 -0800, "Wolfgang" wrote:

On Mar 1, 5:29 pm, wrote:
[...]
But I've not yet met a single first-world person, even among those who think GW
will bring disaster, who is willing to voluntarily alter their lifestyle to the extent it will take to
significantly do anything about GW. No, they just like the warm fuzzies they get from
driving a Prius.

Anyone who _truly_ believes GW is going to bring disaster unless we do
something now, and who still lives a first-world lifestyle, is by
definition acting inconsistent with their beliefs.

Well, he's already gotten us into two useless wars......to the tune of
about half a trillion dollars and a hundred thousand or so corpses.
How do YOU define disaster? And how does my having Indian, Mexican,
Thai, Chinese, German, Vietnamese, Greek, and Italian markets within
walking distance play into the equation?

ahahahahahaha!

I had to read Jon's post twice (which was at least twice more than it was
worth), but even though it sure sounds like he was talking about GW Bush -
what with the repeated use of the Disaster word and all - he really wasn't....

/daytripper (but he could have - or should have ;-)