"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...
Ken Fortenberry wrote in news:jDyJh.5187
:

There is not one single credible climate scientist in the world
who disagrees that the contribution of human activities to global
warming is significant. If a climate scientist questioned this in
the face of the overwhelming body of facts that proves it beyond
doubt then he would no longer be a credible climate scientist.


Unfortunately, Ken, when you make absolute statements like that, they can
prove a little problematic.

http://www-eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen.htm

Of course, we can dicker about whether this guy acknowledges human
intervention as a contributor at all, but hw most definitely does not
recognize it as the main cause.

Who can you name that HAS recognized human intervention as "the main cause"?

There are at least four or five other very
prominent climatologists/meteorologists who share Lindzen's opinions.

For me at least, "weather patterns" and "proven with certainty" should be
banned from appearing together in a sentence.

It has been proven with certainty that weather patterns characteristic of
winter are historically, as well as currently, much more common in January
than in July here is southeastern Wisconsin.

Arrest me.

Wolfgang
who thinks people should be banned from abusing a perfectly innocent
language.