Old Guy wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
There is not one single credible climate scientist in the world
who disagrees that the contribution of human activities to global
warming is significant. If a climate scientist questioned this in
the face of the overwhelming body of facts that proves it beyond
doubt then he would no longer be a credible climate scientist.


OK, so what you're saying is that anyone who questions man-made global
warming is no longer credible? Is that the criteria you use to
determine credibility?

Human activities have increased global atmospheric concentrations
of greenhouse gases *AND* greenhouse gases contribute to global
warming. No *credible* scientist can disagree with these facts, if
they do disagree they are by definition not credible. That's my
criteria.

--
Ken Fortenberry