Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Old Guy wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:


No. I never claimed to have followed your link. Who wants to watch
some crackpot preach bad science to nitwits ? Now if you wanted to
post a link to a refereed journal I might follow that.


You're right.

Yeah, I know.

That crackpot founder of Greenpeace can't be trusted to come up with
anything near reality.

I wouldn't know, I didn't watch it.

Of course you didn't watch it. Viewing might impact your POV and cause
you to question your previous conclusions. Those scientists from TU,
NASA and MIT can't be right because they disagree with your POV.


But if he claims that human
activities don't increase greenhouse gases and that greenhouse
gases don't contribute to global warming then he is indeed a
crackpot who is reality challenged.


Yeah, anybody who questions your POV must a crackpot. Because its not
about science, its about politics, funding and supporting your POV.

So any scientist that shows any skepticism and may question studies must
be a crackpot. If you have drawn your own conclusions, anyone who
questions you must be a crackpot. Anyone coming up with facts that my
contradict your POV must be a crackpot and synthesizing numbers.

Yeah, I see where you're coming from.

Don't waste you time watching that video!! Regardless of the the facts
presented, those crackpots disagree with your POV.