Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Old Guy wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
Old Guy wrote:
Ken Fortenberry wrote:
No. I never claimed to have followed your link. Who wants to watch
some crackpot preach bad science to nitwits ? Now if you wanted to
post a link to a refereed journal I might follow that.

But if he claims that human
activities don't increase greenhouse gases and that greenhouse
gases don't contribute to global warming then he is indeed a
crackpot who is reality challenged.

Yeah, anybody who questions your POV must a crackpot.

Anybody who refuses to accept scientific fact must be a crackpot.

... Anyone coming up with facts that my contradict your POV must be a
crackpot and synthesizing numbers.

I told you this before, if you have facts let's see them. Point
me to refereed, actual science not some crackpot Internet site.
You can't.


http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...11497638&hl=en



Oh, but you refuse to view it because its just a bunch of crackpots.
Why are they crackpots? Because they disagree with your POV.

Doesn't matter who they are. Doesn't matter if its actual science or
not. It disagrees with your POV.

Doesn't matter if the video was produced by the BBC. They must be
crackpots because they don't agree with your POV.

Doesn't matter if the video was produced by the BBC. The BBC must be
crackpots because they disagree with your POV.

Doesn't matter if the scientists interviewed in the video are experts
(PdD's) in their fields related to global warming. They must be
crackpots because they don't agree with your POV.


Please don't watch the scientific evidence as presented in the BBC
video. All those guys are just crackpots because they disagree with
your POV.

And its a crackpot internet site because they are rerunning a video that
disagrees with your POV.



And in ALL cases, don't question any evidence that may contradict your
POV. It must have been gathered by crackpots. They must be crackpots
because they disagree with your POV.

All scientists MUST accept ALL the work of others regardless of what is
presented. Its the job of the scientific comunity to never question or
repeat the research of others. Especially if the work agrees with your POV.