On Mar 19, 4:48 pm, "Halfordian Golfer" wrote:
On Mar 17, 3:54 pm, "Wolfgang" wrote:





On Mar 17, 9:36 am, "Halfordian Golfer" wrote:

On Mar 15, 10:50 pm, George Cleveland
wrote:

http://www.newwest.net/index.php/top...limited_propos...

The NLC is meeting in the very near future concerning this. Send the
folks at National an emaill and tell them what you think.

http://tu.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/tu.cf...duser/home.php

g.c.

Oh and **** Lefty Kreh and Don (Dan?) Beaver too.

http://asshookedwhitey.blogspot.com/...dwhitey_archiv...

What's funny is that some people thing TU is a conservation
organization.

No, that's not funny. They ARE a conservation organization. That
everything they do is not to my liking or supportive of your demented
fantasies is to expected from any and every organization whatsoever,
regardless of the issues they deal with or the positions they take.

That one still cracks me up.

One is tempted to say that this is because you don't understand the
organization, the issue, or why people take the stances they do, and
this would be a perfectly reasonable thing to say were it not for the
simple fact that your statement can be more easily explained.

You're a liar.

Wolfgang

Conservation organizations do NOT promote releasing non-indiginous
species nor do they promote the spread of zebra snails on the boots of
competitive trout fishermen, regardless of the rhetoric. As soon as I
see a flier from TU that says "Kill every rainbow trout in Colorado
that you catch" I will believe that they are a conservation group.

O.k., let's see if we can work together here and try to figure out
whether I give a **** what you do, don't, will, and/or won't believe.
Can we do that?

Otherwise STFU.

Yeah, that's gonna happen.

Wolfgang