On Mar 19, 5:02 pm, "Halfordian Golfer" wrote:
On Mar 17, 3:54 pm, "Wolfgang" wrote:





On Mar 17, 9:36 am, "Halfordian Golfer" wrote:

On Mar 15, 10:50 pm, George Cleveland
wrote:

http://www.newwest.net/index.php/top...limited_propos...

The NLC is meeting in the very near future concerning this. Send the
folks at National an emaill and tell them what you think.

http://tu.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/tu.cf...duser/home.php

g.c.

Oh and **** Lefty Kreh and Don (Dan?) Beaver too.

http://asshookedwhitey.blogspot.com/...dwhitey_archiv...

What's funny is that some people thing TU is a conservation
organization.

No, that's not funny. They ARE a conservation organization. That
everything they do is not to my liking or supportive of your demented
fantasies is to expected from any and every organization whatsoever,
regardless of the issues they deal with or the positions they take.

That one still cracks me up.

One is tempted to say that this is because you don't understand the
organization, the issue, or why people take the stances they do, and
this would be a perfectly reasonable thing to say were it not for the
simple fact that your statement can be more easily explained.

You're a liar.

Wolfgang

Oh and, while you're at it, tell me 'conservation for what'?

No.

If they
aren't conserving the resource so that I can catch and eat a few than
what are they conserving it for?

Unlike the rest of the world, it appears that they just might have
concerns other than the desparate need to further increase your
girth. You want to know what those concerns could possibly be? Ask
them.

So that people can hook them in the
face for the pure hell of it?

No, for the pure enjoyment of it.

Ask them why they don't conserve
lizards...

No.

Halfordian Golfer

Stupid moniker.

Moron.

A cash flow runs through it

Stupid mantra.

Guilt debased the meal.

Wolfgang
ho hum.