On Apr 12, 3:09 pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
wrote in news:1176380869.916237.321610
@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:





On Apr 12, 2:18 pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
wrote in news:1176370200.579014.314410
@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

The only reason I am hanging on here is to help accelerate that
demise
in any way I can.

Mike, that would make you a creep. And a childish creep at that.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Indeed? That is a very interesting observation. What is your opinion
on people who call others nazi homos, or a variety of other choice
epithets? Nice guys? Pillars of society? Shining lights for youthful
fly-anglers? Paragons of virtue?

I have already been called a creep several times, it is boring. If you
can´t think of something new to help with the circus then I rather
fear your input is superfluous.

MC

Mike,

Based on a person's behavior, I draw my opinions. Just because I don't
spend my time here spouting off my opinion of others does not mean I do
not have opinions of them. That said, I don't need you to tell me what
those opinions are, or to whom I should state them. Your apparent
assumption that I need your guidance in such matters is central to your
arrogance problem. Should the behavior of others start interfering with
my fair use of this board, as is your stated creepy goal (once again, "if
I can't enjoy it, nobody will", a goal a petulant five year old would be
proud to pursue), I will let them know, in no uncertain terms.

Further, I wasn't necessarily calling you a name. I was telling you what
I think of you. There is a difference. Illustratively, I can't believe
anyone reading roff could conceivably believe you are a "nappy-headed
nazi homo", which you have been called numerous times. Many, however,
would glady second "creep". You're on a tear George Gherke himself would
be proud of. I suspect he's looking down on all this right now,
snickering about how right he was about you.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Here, the word "creep" is simply a general insult. I assumed nothing
at all, I merely asked a few questions. It seems my ideas of honour
and fairness differ very considerably from others on this group. I owe
you no explanations, nor do I owe anybody else any. I will continue to
pursue my aims as long as I consider it politic to do so. Since I don
´t believe in anything at all, much less a saintly Gehrke looking down
from somewhere, I must perforce undertake my own endeavours in
defending myself against those who would malign me. What you write is
of passing interest, but it gets me no nearer to my target. What you
believe is also irrelevant. It is not a case of "if I can't enjoy it,
nobody will", it is a case of doing my absolute utmost to ensure that
these people can not continue to malign me, here or elsewhere, and
preferably to ensure that they don´t do it to anybody else either.

MC