WHat is Spam
johnval1 wrote:
"Ken Fortenberry" wrote:
There you go again. I have no objections whatsoever to "these guys".
My objections are solely related to Usenet SPAM, commercials posted
to a non-commercial Usenet newsgroup. Any one of the folks mentioned
in this thread could have my next-to-last Budweiser or a seat in the
front of my canoe or both.
Sorry Ken, I knew Ronald Reagan and you're no Ronald Regan :-)
Since I take it you are speaking in very generalized terms with no specific
people in mind, I guess this conversation has run aground. Rodney and
Randy, "you guys" appear to be off the hook.
Why do you want to posit personalities into a discussion of SPAM ?
I can disagree with folks without finding them "reprehensive" or
"objectionable", apparently you have some difficulty in that regard.
You sound to me like a troublemaker. You suggested I *plonk* some
long-time contributors to this forum but if all you have to contribute
is s***-stirring I'd be better advised to just *plonk* you.
And get yourself a real dog, pugs are for sissies.
--
Ken Fortenberry
|