In article 36, Cliff
writes
We are helping entire species exist and flourish, so I see the price of
some of their species being caught and released as biologically very cheap.

Furthermore, it is no more painful than being eaten alive by an Otter, or
swallowed whole by a bigger fish or bird and being dissolved alive in their
digestive tract!




What pathetic unrelated evidential statements to present. What gives
you the right to decide what is biologically cheap anyway?

In the first case - catch and release fishing is for the fun and
"enjoyment" of the angler who could well find his fun elsewhere

The second case i the survival of the other creatures who hunt fish for
food and some of those creatures may well by hunted themselves to feed a
higher order species.
--
Bill Grey