Dave LaCourse wrote:

On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 08:20:12 -0500, Conan The Librarian
wrote:

OK, now that you've gotten that out of the way, answer us a question
or two, Dave: Do you agree with Bush commuting Libby's sentence? If so,
why

Yes, because the whole thing was politicized. The jail sentence was
for political reason. Cheney didn't out Plame, nor did Libby; her job
as a CIA employee was well known in the Beltway.
They couldn't get him on that, so they got him on something of less
import. Jail time was not necessary because of the fine, disbarment,
shame, etc. Would you like also for the man to bleed for you? Would
that sate your appetite for revenge for what happened to Clinton, or
is your lust for revenge insatiable? You wear your hypocricy on your
sleeve like a religious zealot.

First of all, you obviously have no idea of my feelings about the
whole issue. (FWIW, I am not a fan of Clinton; never have been, and
never will be.) Secondly, what's up with this "bleed for you" ...
"appetite for revenge" ... lust for revenge"? Sounds like you're
projecting your own hatred for Klinton onto others.

Third, if you are going to continually use a "big word" like that,
learn how to spell it. It's "hypocrisy". And feel free to point out
*exactly* what I've written that is hypocritical; not what you imagine
in your fevered imagination that I *might* write, but quotes of what I
have written.


Chuck Vance (and fourth: you might want to wipe some of the
spittle off your keyboard)