On Jul 3, 11:17 am, Dave LaCourse wrote:

Yes, because the whole thing was politicized. The jail sentence was
for political reason. Cheney didn't out Plame, nor did Libby; her job
as a CIA employee was well known in the Beltway.

How is a prosecution by a conservative republican prosecutor (who
stated Plume was a covert operative in direct contradiction to yours
and others accounts that her role was known.) in front of a
conservative republican appointed judge known for "throwing the book
at people" and setting examples is politicized?

And, why not bring up Clinton? He is the precedent in all of this.
He had more folks convicted than any president in history. His was an
even more corrupt administration than this one.

Please post support for this, After a quick and casual google search
appears that Grant, Harding, Nixon, Bush I, and maybe even Reagan had
more members convicted/indicted/sentenced/fined/fired for conduct
while on the government payroll then what appeared to happen in the
Clinton adminstration. By and large the Clinton administration issues
dealt with issues unrelated to their government activities? But
getting an un-biased scorecard was not found in the search so I would
use "appears".