Thread
:
husband's revenge
View Single Post
#
17
October 26th, 2003, 01:04 PM
Peter Charles
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
husband's revenge
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 04:32:49 GMT,
(Greg Pavlov)
wrote:
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 19:25:40 -0400, Peter Charles
wrote:
Ya, we did the execution bizness way better. What rw was trying to
say -- hang 'em but haul 'em down before they lose consciousness.
then while they're still squirming, slice their bellies open,....
I wondered how the whole thing was put together:
I read the sentences but they weren't specific
enough, especially w/respect to the fire. Wouldn't
burning them alive, or dipping them in some hot
oil, been a lot simpler and just as painful ?
Ya but not half as much fun. This was the punishment for treason so
it had to have good spectator appeal. If your executioner liked you
or if you tipped him (in advance, of course) then he left you hanging
a tad too long so you didn't get to feel the rest of the proceedings.
Peter
turn mailhot into hotmail to reply
Visit The Streamer Page at
http://www.mountaincable.net/~pcharl...ers/index.html
Peter Charles