On 16 Sep, 19:09, wrote:
On 16-Sep-2007, Mike wrote:

You may of course, like many "anglers", simply stick your head in the
sand, ( or as in the case of Kenny Boy, perpetual performing ****er of
this parish, up your arse), it is however certain that the known
problems, and possibly quite a few unknown ones will catch up with you
before long, and will also be visited upon your children. You are
actively aiding and abetting environmental destruction on a large
scale, for no other reason than convenient personal gratification.
Oh and Kenny Boy, before you start your usual nonsense, since you are
far too ignorant and stupid to refute or even discuss any of this
sensibly, I would suggest you go and jerk off somewhere else.

TL
MC

Again - in the beginning of this post you made a good point
Why did you have to add this lunatic crap at the end?

Fred

Well Fred, I don´t know anything much about Japan, except what I can
read on the web, and I have not even read much of that. I try to
address the problems in my own neighbourhood, although this can only
be in a relatively small way. Acquiring specific information on some
of these things is also becoming increasingly difficult, as a number
of the extremely large industrial concerns, which operate globally,
actively conceal all sorts of things, because they don´t want people
to know the extent of their control, and the massive damage they are
causing for profit.

Many anglers are simply unaware of the facts, and there are also a
number who refuse to believe them, as well as a few who know them, and
continue anyway, because they put their own doubtful "enjoyment" above
any other considerations.

Which brings us back to the "lunatic crap" you mention. Fortenberry
is a problem. Not only because he is a pschopathic arsehole, who gets
his kicks by damaging others, but because his behaviour also
effectively suppresses information and common sense. Quite apart form
the fact that his behaviour generally prevents the free interchange of
information here, and severely affects the enjoyment of many.

Why you think I should address one severe problem, ( indeed a whole
complex of problems), in an orderly, sensible, logical and informed
fashion, and at the same time fail to address another problem which
has caused myself and others considerable grief, is rather odd don´t
you think?

Why do you think he should be allowed to continue abusing and
insulting people, or posting a load of propaganda against me, and
others, but that I should not be allowed to retaliate?

I really would like to know.

TL
MC