"Ken Fortenberry" wrote in message
...
Mike wrote:
Considerations on angling for stock fish.

I have a numbre of objections to angling for stocked rainbow trout.
These are based entirely on the facts known to me, and are not a
result of "snobbery" or any other such silly considerations, as some
people seem to assume.

This is considerably more temperate and reasonable than what
you posted on fishing for stocked fish just three days ago:

"No responsible and conservation
minded angler in full possession of his senses, and the knowledge of
what he is fishing for, how it was obtained and treated, quite apart
form the side-effects of eating such heavily chemically treated filth,
would even contemplate "angling" for such."

1. The use of such fish is a massive drain on the environment. ...

And this is quite different than this from three days ago:

"Doubtless, but fishing for stocked rainbows causes heavy environmental
damage."

Most of your arguments against fish stocking are informed by an
unreasonable conflation of aquaculture and fisheries management
but at least you've learned to state them in a civil fashion
without calling those who fish for stocked fish, (which includes
the vast majority of roff btw), "criminally ignorant".

--
Ken Fortenberry


Is ignorance of the law an excuse?

john