This group
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:26:39 -0000, salmobytes
wrote:
Yes, Mike has contributed too. Ken kept him at
a frenzy rate as best he could. Out of control
posts from all such sources would simply be
erased in a moderated forum. I hesitate to mention the names of the
forums
I prefer to read these days. I wouldn't want to cause
those moderators any more work than they already have.
I've jumped into these spats occasionally too (like now).
The increasing frequency of these never-ending **** storms
may or may not be related to the downhill spiral in readership.
But I think it is.
Three points:
1. I believe it is impossible to have a "moderated group under the
rec domain.
2. Fortenberry has been here since this place started. How could it
be "successful" and then "unsuccessful" when he hasn't changed in the
12 or so years I have known him.
3. You want a fly fishing news group to exist, don't moderate it.
That would be a death kiss.
There is nothing different about roff in 1997 or 2007. It is the same
place, rough and tumble, and it will continue to be rough and tumble.
The latest spat with Connor is nothing new. He has been doing that
for several years. Remember when Gehrke was alive? It was the same
thing. Believe it or not, some people are amused by Connor's antics,
just as they were with Gehrke's.
Dave
|