Tom Nakashima wrote:
"Julie" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Ken Fortenberry wrote:

Now see, this is what I'm talkin' about. I can't possibly
make a college football bet with the boy lawyer from Nawth
Cackalacky based on the point spreads because the point
spreads for Illinois are consistently insane. The unranked
Illini play the #5 Wisconsin Badgers this weekend and the
Illini are 2.5 point *favorites* !!!! Holy **** ! What the
F*** !! I wouldn't take that bet if we were only *given*
three points much less the other way around.

It's no wonder cases of booze and wine flow from Illinois
to the home of the Tar Heels. It's a conspiracy I tell ya.

THEN BET THE OTHER WAY. Even a dumb gurl like me can figure that out IQ
equivalent of President Pussy.

That was funny....
she gottcha, she gottcha real good! cigars cigars!!!
Oh common Kennies, where's that fighting Illini spirit? Take the -2.5...
...think it might even be -3 now, by game time -5 lol

Yeah, neither one of you understand the nature of the traditional
season-long roff football bet. Each week your team is playing
against the spread and each week their performance against the
spread determines whether you win, lose or tie for the week.
So if Illinois actually does beat Wisconsin by 3 this week they
will win against the spread and if Wayno's Tar Heels lose by only
9 or less against Miami (the spread on that game is Miami -10) he
will also win, so the week ends in a tie. Get it ?

What I'm whining about is the ridiculous spreads Illinois gets
week in and week out. This weeks spread is a prime example of why
I have lost this stupid freaking bet more often than not and what
seems like year in and year friggin' out for the last decade or so.

--
Ken Fortenberry