On 2 Nov, 21:48, Scott Seidman wrote:
Mike wrote groups.com:



On 2 Nov, 13:33, Scott Seidman wrote:
Mike wrote in
news:1193987383.250227.66000 @k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com:

I wonder what you would have said if his dog had died?

MC

You do us quite the service, putting our daily bantering in
perspective. We really should be saving this stuff up for when real
sick ****s like you decide to come around.

Isn't it time for you to be passing out soon?

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Always glad to be of service, even to less than deserving hypocritical
arseholes on whom the expression "double standards" is largely wasted,
and in any case a shameless understatement.

So Ttocs my old fruit, I hope I did not interrupt your daily
bantering?

At one time, ****bags like you unsettled me considerably, but that was
when I though you were civilised. Now I merely hold you in extreme
contempt, and have a little dig at you now and again.

Have a lousy day! At least you deserve that.

MC

I have no double standard, Mike. I have opinions on everyone I meet.
Sometimes they're good opinions, and sometimes they're not good opinions.

It's fairly rare that I feel compelled to share my opinions with others,
finding it far more politic to keep my mouth shut. It takes a good
effort on your part to get me to rise up like this, and usually it takes
longer than one post, but this time you opted to criticize a man for how
he grieved over the passing of his daughter, and the bile rose
immediately and vehemently. If you find some merit in that, it would
make you happy to know that I was physically nauseated by your behavior.

It will take more than you to ruin my day today-- I just found out that
my brother endowed a scholarship, in the name of our parents, who worked
very hard to send us to school with very little in the way of resources.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply


I am not in the least interested in ruining your day, I don´t know
you, or anything about you, except that you are a ****bag who insulted
me in public, and I could not care less how your day goes. You
initiated proceedings by calling me a homo etc. When you behave in
such a fashion you must expect to be treated appropriately.

Never fails to amaze me how you people conflate totally unrelated
matters in such a confused fashion.

The gentleman in question sent identical posts to several NG´s, and
identical follow ups, about his dead dog as well. That is not
grieving, it is calculating, most especially in view of his "normal"
behaviour. With which I am all too familiar.

You have never met me, and yet you apparently think it right to call
me a homo, as an insult, ( that´s what homophobes do by the way), and
make obscene suggestions, among other things, on a public newsgroup.
Indeed, supporting Fortenberry and Dean, who initiated these
completely unfounded personal attacks and propaganda.

I already told you, I only respect civilised people, and nowadays
those are the only people I accord respect and manners. If you don´t
like my replies to your outrageous crap, either learn to behave
yourself in a civilised manner, keep your mouth shut, or go and ****
yourself. Makes no difference to me.

It´s really quite simple, you try to **** me about in public, and I
will simply tell you in plain words what a ****bag you are.

I don´t care who you are, what you are, or whether your brother is the
pope, to me you are just a ****bag trying to annoy me.

MC