Mike typed:
On 12 Dec, 23:43, "Tim J." wrote:

I would like anyone to tell me why, under *any* circumstances, it
would be deemed to be socially acceptable for a manufacturer or
retailer to promote the cash value of adolescent girls or boys
sexual organs. I mean, I know I'm the resident prude and all, but
this is rather a sick portrayal of a joke-for-profit scheme. Also
interesting would be how many of those were sold to parents who
thought they were "cute."

Idiots. ((c) Wolfgang)

I doubt it was done to be "socially acceptable", it was done to make
money for somebody.

The question remains *DID* it make money for the retailer. If "yes", then
there are sickos out there among us (you know who you are.)
--
TL,
Tim
-------------------------
http://css.sbcma.com/timj