"Tim J." wrote in message
...

I would like anyone to tell me why, under *any* circumstances, it would be
deemed to be socially acceptable for a manufacturer or retailer to promote
the cash value of adolescent girls or boys sexual organs. I mean, I know
I'm the resident prude and all, but this is rather a sick portrayal of a
joke-for-profit scheme. Also interesting would be how many of those were
sold to parents who thought they were "cute."

See dicklet's posts on this matter. Wonder of wonders, he has, at long
last, offered some observations that merit consideration.*

Idiots. (© Wolfgang)

Actually, I stole that from a source I shall never reveal. I leave the
original author's identity as an exercise for our esteemed cadre of literary
sleuths.

Wolfgang
*who feels it should hardly be necessary to add that "consideration" is not
exactly synonymous with accepting a single word of it as necessarily being
true.