"bob" wrote in message
.com...
Actually I am the man who was employed to do the site - how astute of you
both.

Aw hell, Sparky, you ain't seen **** yet. A lot of the guys in this group
never even stopped to breath hard at astute. Some of them (and don't you
dare tell them I said so) stop just this side of brilliant....not to
mention (as mfitons so incisively puts it) occasionally hilarious. Stick
around here for just a bit and I can guarandamntee you, you WILL ****in'
bleed.

The problem is, I new nothing about fly fishing until I did it the
site

That is "A" problem. We will be happy to demonstrate, free of charge, that
you have others which should concern you a great deal more.......take
English orthography, for instance.

and have become interested in the sport.

It ain't a sport, Sport, it's a......um.....a ethos.....or a penumbra.....or
sumthin'.

Hence the curiosity and the post.

As perhaps even you have begun to suspect by now, the message you posted may
have fallen somewhat short of the best possible means of saisfying that
curiosity. This suspicion should, and as a matter of fact would, give a
thinking human being puase. The course you chose to take in response to the
reaction you got the first time around speaks volumes.

Spam away my ignorant friends.

Aside from the near certainty (trust me on this one) that neither of the
individuals you refer to is likely to consider you a friend, I doubt that
either of them is as confused as you apparently are about the nature of
spam.

Not everyone is dishonest.

Hence the welcome you've received here.

Unfortunately for
you both, you have no decency, nor respect or trust for your fellow man.

Unsubstantiated, speculative, argumentative, stupid, insipid, and just plain
wrong.

How sad, and how proud you must be.

While there is no reason to suppose a priori that a simple observation
simply stated would necessarily be incapable of engendering both sadness and
pride in the individuals who authored it, there is no reason, in this case,
to suspect that it did either.

Being a webmaster don't you think I know
that the info you discovered would be easily found?

The use of the singular "a" in the above suggests to the careful reader,
notwithstanding the garbled syntax and the attendant ambiguity, that it is
the author, rather than the auditors (or lectors, if you want to be a
stickler for form) who is referred to as a "webmaster". Thus, as "master"
is a widely accepted honorific denoting a high degree of proficiency and
professionalism, your self-referential use of the term is presumptuous,
grossly and undeservedly self-congratulatory, and transparently dishonest.
You should be ashamed of yourself.......and somebody should tell your
mother.

Please go to the nearest blind man and poke em in the eye.

And what exactly, pray tell, do you think they just did?

Wolfgang
who's got a shiny new nickel says this one won't be around for very long.