On Jan 11, 10:14 am, rw wrote:
salmobytes wrote:
On Jan 11, 9:13 am, "Wolfgang" wrote:

"salmobytes" wrote in message

We're dealing with speculation based on what appears on the screen.
Plus.....coding experience. 12 years now, since bs in cs.

Well I have a PhD in CS, so there! :-)

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.

A phd in cs? No wonder you're so odd! :-)


I shoot lots of fly photos. It's my hobby.
But the idea of shooting 40 frames is daunting. It would be difficult
to spin the vise in 40 even increments.

Even in the original author did do that (40 exposures) I'm thinking
he didn't have to. Software does exist, that would make it reasonable
to shoot say 8-12 exposures, and then interpolate the rest.

Hmmm. I'd love to have a few 360' fly-image rotations on my own site.
But I wouldn't even consider 40 exposures per fly. The photoshop
touchup work alone would drive me nuts.
But if I could do 8 such frames, and click a mouse to do the rest,
then I'd do it to it.

From now until the monitor still shines bright, I will click the
keyboard
no more forever (about this). It's time to tie some flies. Or shoot
some photos (and not 40 damnit).