Dave LaCourse wrote in
:

On 15 Feb 2008 23:01:39 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

It's not looking like it will be her, but should it happen, remember
to thank all the Republicans who did nothing to reign in the Unitary
Executive with no common sense.

You mean to tell me that Hillary is running because Bush is POTUS?
She'd be running and complaining if Jesus Christ Himself was POTUS.
The Dems control the House, yet I see no impeachment proceedings.
Until then, all of your complaints are worthless, Scott.

Dave




No, I mean to say that if Hillary is the nominee, she will win because Bush
is POTUS. You don't need impeachment proceedings to rope the guy in-- and
he has been pretty well impotent since the Dems got the majority.

In fairness, I would like to see the Dems do more. If the Dems demand a
timetable, they would get it. It's Bush who is over the barrel. You don't
need the 60 votes for cloture-- its the 51 votes you need for passage that
hold the most power. I think the Dems are foolishly trying to avoid an
even worse "do-nothing" label.


--
Scott
Reverse name to reply