On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:07:29 -0500, Opus--Mark H. Bowen "Opus--Mark H.
Bowen" wrote in message
:


"Jim Edmondson" wrote in message
global.net...
[quoted text muted]

In other words, you're saying that you don't know what the **** you are
saying, right.

I'm saying that you are an asshole


You want folks who might chose to support Obama to cite a litany of
experiences that should *supposedly* have to qualify him for the White
House, yet you are unable to do so yourself for any particular candidate?

I am keeping an open mind

Last I checked the US Constitution, experience wasn't a requirement for the
position, as Bush has proven so disastrously.

To paraphrase the a rabid conservatives mantra:

If I were voting today, and the (impractical) choices were McCain or
Hillary, and the (practical) choice is Obama, I'd vote Obama hands
down--since there aren't any non-Dems/Repubs on the ballot, so far.

You are not voting today, so who cares

Why?

See above

The same reason I said Nader, twice - he was the best choice in the
(impractical)
field of three, no more, no less.

Op

That was an effective use of your vote

bye
--
Jim
posted from Ubuntu/Pan