"Scott Seidman" wrote in message
. 1.4...

snip
To drift even more off topic, I think its a pity that Ethics committees
have more of a problem with a closeted gay guy in a restroom committing a
misdemeanor than a drunken drugged up Kennedy offspring driving down the
street.


--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

Scott,
Ethics committees did not go after Craig because he was a "closeted gay guy
in a restroom committing a misdemeanor ", or after Clinton because he got a
blow job in the oval office, or after Packwood because he gropped women;
they went after them because in each case they lied under oath (either in a
court proceeding and/or to Congress) about what had happened. The fact that
this is not a meaningless distinction is lost on too many people.

Bob Weinberger