"JT" wrote in message
...

"Halfordian Golfer" wrote in message
...
Just because I disagree with your definition and belief about C&R it's
crap.
OK....

Socratic? Yeah right!

JT

The fact JT is that you mocked the agreement we had and you flat
answered a different question. The question I asked was true or false
and you went on about some 'definition of C&R'. This was really unfair
as I laid it out there in my answer as part of the gentlemen's
agreement and acknowledged that I routinely practice C&R, something
I've said in the past. In fact JT I routinely fished the 1st public
waters in the United States that was managed as pure C&R under the
"Fishing is Fun" program and was pretty staunch for about 25 years
that I'm concluding we need a better strategy and have always felt the
animal rights people could crush us by applying this same logical set
of questions.

Wrong again... I didn't answer your question true for the simple fact that
I didn't agree with everything in your question.

That should read "FALSE" no true....