View Single Post
  #6  
Old March 13th, 2008, 04:52 PM posted to alt.flyfishing
Halfordian Golfer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 551
Default Poll: If you had to keep your fish, would you still fish?

On Mar 12, 5:52 pm, Dave LaCourse wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:09:05 -0700 (PDT), Halfordian Golfer

wrote:
If the fishing laws were written in such a way that you had to kill
all legal fish that you caught and, as well, you had to quit when you
had a bag, would you still fish?


That's put and take water. Only Purina Dog Chow fish in that water.
I wouldn't fish it NOT because I had to kill fish, but because the
fish wouldn't be worth fishing for or killing to eat.

Dave


Ho Dave,

Iit would not assume put and take by a long shot, anymore than that
put and take wild salmon on your plate this evening. Though it would
include put and take areas. Only when they stock catchables which
represents a considerable expense and which is not done as much as
folks think it is.

Bone