FishingBanter - View Single Post

**[email protected]** · March 31st, 2008, 03:33 PM posted to rec.outdoors.fishing.fly

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:32:20 GMT, wrote:

On 30-Mar-2008, wrote:

No matter who wins, WE LOSE

Oh, goody, another includer...or, um, not...have you got a list of names
as to just who is included in this alleged "we?"

HTH,
R

This should have been an OT post so I apologize for continuing it as normal

You are such a red white and blue good old American boy so I just wanna ask
you how can you believe in the crap the politicians tell you much less

...what you write...

And therein lies the problem as I see it with your posts and responses:
you seem to wish to be taken seriously and thoughtfully, yet you don't
seem to care enough about what you write even to do a cursory
proofreading. Is everything everyone else writes, myself included,
always clear and unambiguous? No, sometimes it happens accidentally,
other times its purposeful, but speaking only for myself, careful
readers who aren't trying to read into responses things that aren't
there do well enough. And again, speaking only for myself, I'm
generally willing to clarify anything (note - "clarify" and "justify"
aren't the same thing...) I've written for those who seemingly have a
legitimate misunderstanding. You seem to assume, like many here, a
number of things about every response and its writer and your
assumptions are often wildly incorrect.

Further, I can't think of a single example of a response of yours that
was anything more than an illogical and/or presumptive rant full of
(hard-to-read) misspellings, etc., generally including or soon followed
by a whine about "off-topic" or sticking to fishing. Generally, you get
what you give, so to speak. If one wishes to engage in reasonable
debate, fair enough - have the courtesy to at least attempt to do so. If
one wishes to respond with ranting nonsense full of unfounded
assumptions and myriad errors, fair enough - you'll get nonsense/shtick
in return, at least from me.

I really do hope this helps,
R

What I really said was that I would rather ponder dog feces than MCain
Lieberman and Iraq
I did not say that i do such things

I cannot believe nor empathize nor understand with how you think??????

Do you think that McLanin Clinton Obama Bush Cheney Hillary

Do they think like you?
Do you think like them?

Do they truly represent and care for you and the American public or are they
just faces all rearranged and given another name?
MCcain has been a retread for 15 yrs already
Hilary is ugly as sin

And Obama
If elected he would be assasinated to deflect the real problem away from a
class war to a race war!
The rich are getting richer
The SuadI family that we support, the Kuwaitis the Abbu Dhabians
They are all wonderful and caring allies - Cmon man wake up!

Do you you try to disparage my political or anti political beliefs by
trying to make fun of me? - i.e, what I believe is bull****?
because you think I am strange or my views are?
Well esp w politcs and with what we do to our planet in my name and tax
monery this enflames me So I am ****ling strange and impassioned

You - you are way off the track.
Going the wrong way!

I think in some way you fear what I have to say and disparage it
But if you are a conscious being you know that Hilary et all is just pure
media crap.
So is American Idol Coca Cola and McCain Potato Chips

Crazy ****in world
That why I fish or at least .
To forget all this and stand in a cleanclear cold river
Catching fiash is nice but really who cares?

We are still in the grip of winter
Perhaos I am goin nuts

Fred