On Fri, 2 May 2008 13:03:36 -0700 (PDT), Mike
wrote:

On May 2, 9:56 pm, Scott Seidman wrote:
Mike wrote in news:89e09b57-d515-4811-80d2-
:

Not logical to assume that.

No need to assume anything that hours of field testing verifies.

--
Scott
Reverse name to reply

If you tried fishing in the water,

Like in a bowl...?

at the correct depth,

OK, how big is the bowl...?

then you might change your mind.

Yeah, anything is possible...

No matter how many hours you test a two nymph
rig in a field, neither of the nymphs will be in the best place for
catching a fish.

Testing proves it...

If you do fish in the water,

A soup bowl? A salad bowl? A trainstation toilet bowl?

and have no idea of the water depth, then
using two flies is not going to change that.

But one is better than side-scan sonar...

Regardless of the depth you set, you only have two possibilities.

Dumb and dumber?

Either both flies are in the wrong place.

One in the bowl and one in Dieter's mouth...?

or one fly is in the wrong place.

Well, if anyone ought to know about the wrong place for his fly, it'd be
you...

At least if you use only one fly, you can´t have two flies in the
wrong place.

Sure you can - one in the bowl and one in Dieter...

TL
MC

HTH,
Dickie