On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:48:47 -0400, daytripper
wrote:

On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 17:43:08 -0500, wrote:

If the cover art floating around is real, wait 'til the latest "New
Yorker" comes out...or, if you can't, do a Google search: Obama Michelle
terrorists...this oughta be interesting...

"Interesting"? Really? To whom? To you nitwit righties?

Your suggested Google search yields about a hundred send-ups of that idiot
Faux News reader (who is now in deep, deep storage) E. D. Hill's "terrorist
fist jab" tickler. Is that what you were hoping for?

No, I have no idea if it's the actual next-issue cover, and a _very_
quick Google image search didn't turn it up. But I do think that if it
is real, "New Yorker" is making a mistake by doing this, regardless of
the effect (if any, positive or negative) on Obama's campaign. Show him
spilling his over-priced California Chardonnay while hitting the person
three alleys away with his bowling ball, show Michelle and Martha
Stewart as Stepford preppies, show him scraping ice off a little old
lady's Rolls windshield with his Platinum Card while he and Chris Dodd
get a 1% mortgage, or other silly-assed stuff, but to give _any_ cred to
the whole "terrorist fist jab" crap is a monumentally bad idea.

/daytripper
(who knows 98.5% of the voting public has no clue what "The New Yorker" is)

Even worse.

HTH,
R