"Peaceful Bill" wrote in message
...
daytripper wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:18:02 -0500, Peaceful Bill
wrote:
Are you saying the report is false? Or are you trying to deflect from
the disaster the Dems are proposing?
"disaster"?
The Republicans have run this country into the deepest financial ditch in
its
history - your great grandchildren will still be paying off the TRILLIONS
of
dollars of debt they've kited - and you call a ten cent per gallon tax to
provide for the national infrastructure - that the same Republican
nitwits
ignored while they controlled Congress - a "disaster"?
The cause for most of the debt are the entitlement programs created by the
Democrats.
Please provide proof--actual facts--that support this laughable assertion.
Forget the national debt, forget the thousands of Americans killed while
Shrub
slept at the switch, forget the thousands of Americans killed in an
unnecessary war, forget the banking crisis, forget the housing crisis,
forget
the climbing unemployment rate, forget the undermining of the EPA, forget
the
undermining of the FDA, but let's call a dime a gallon tax to fix
crumbling
highways, tunnels and bridges a "disaster".
Idiot.
/daytripper (who didn't realize anyone could drink *that* much Kool-Aid)
And why is there a housing / mortgage crisis? Banking crisis? Were those
a result of laws passed during the Clinton administration to make it
easier to get mortgage loans? Just what was the origin of the sub-prime
crisis?
I'd say it's greed unregulated among a very protected group and that both
parties are to blame, but you seem hell bent to blame Clinton and his admin.
before you know the simplist of facts. And what banking crisis are you
speaking of?
Unemployment rate is about the same during the Clinton administration when
they claimed that 4.5% was full employment.
Too funny! Umm considering that the unemployment rate was at 7.4% when
Clinton took over after daddy Bush, and it was down to 4.0% by the time he
left office in 2000. Excepect for a hangover period after daddy Bush left
office in which the rate continued to climb for a period--to a high of 7.8%
in June of '92--before Clinton's economic policies took effect, the rate
dropped steadily over the next 7 years.
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/data/UNRATE.txt
What undermining of the EPA? Do you mean creating sensible rules in which
to live and operate?
So breathing and drinking water aren't high on your list of living
standards? Not that I'm surprised mind ya.
Undermining the FDA? Do you mean getting potentially helpful drugs to the
needy in a more timely manner?
Please support this claim! Hell the poor and elderly were and likely still
are driving across the border to Canada to gain access to reasonably priced
meds! And a slew of med have been pull in the last 7 years due to falsified
or poor testing standards.
Flat-earth imbecile.
Flat-head Moron!
Op
** Posted from
http://www.teranews.com **