On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:41:09 GMT, "Tom Littleton"
wrote:

lessee.....vote suppression, bogus counting process, a few other things.
And, for the record, such corruption of popular vote goes on in countless
ways, nationwide, all the time.

Probably does. It was said that JFK (whom I voted for) won Chicago
and therefore Ill. because of voter fraud.

In 2000, in Florida, it just allowed the
elected officials of Florida(GOP) to 'declare' victory of a candidate under
dubious circumstances, with the Supreme Court maintaining the state's right
to do so.


Have you read the supreme's decision. It simply affirmed that the
State of Florida could not change the voting laws post facto. There
were, what, 5 recounts with Gore losing all of them. The law stated
that the results had to be in by Jan 1. The Florida Supremes tried to
change that law with their own Chief Justice recusing himself because
he knew they couldn't do what they tried to do. Apparently he was the
only honest justice on the Florida supremes. BTW, ALL the supremes in
Florida were appointed by Democrats. They did recounts and recounts
and recounts, with Gore losing every one. The Dems wanted to only
recount one district - heavily Democrat. Was that the correct thing
to do? Yeah, if you wanted Gore to win.

So, are you saying that they should have kept up the recounts well
past the day the president was to take office, or until Gore won a
recount? I will guarantee that if Gore won just ONE of the recounts
the Florida Dems would have declared him the winner. Just ONE. Bush
won ALL the recounts. Dimple chads, pregnant chads, hanging chads ad
nauseum..... Gore LOST. Get over it.

Dave