On Sep 4, 10:58*am, wrote:
On Sep 4, 8:06*am, Frank Church wrote:

wrote:

...your inability to spell simple words does not help your veracity and
your rabid political BS is further proof that
education does not confer common sense. Those liberal profs apparently
poked a lot of bull**** in your mush brains.

Frank Sr.

But of course you cannot dispute anything in my post. Can you?
Put up or shut up time. Or just **** into the wind like you just did.
Im going fishing for a few days. Lets see if you can actually learn
what happened in that time frame, given your superiority thingy.

We know a bit more about Alaskan politics up here in the Pacific NW.
Our papers and media actually cover Alaska. Do yours? Ive worked *in
Alaskan and really like Alaskans in general. But their taste for
getting others to pay the bills is notorious. Claiming she and
Alaskans decry pork is hilarious. *Just does not fly. As you are about
to learn.

Since you are informed about Alaska fiscal details, perhaps you can
expand on the information that, in the agreement preceding statehood,
the Alaskans said they didn't want to become wards of the federal
government, but couldn't see any way to avoid it, given their
industrial status. The Feds promised to unlock the land to allow for
the extraction of the resources that would allow the state to take
care of itself. You saw what it took to get the pipeline.
So far, other than that and some token teeth-pulling, it hasn't
happened. Unlock the land and AK will pay it all back, with interest.

cheers

oz, who understands that there is a reason the Forest Service is under
the Dept. of Agriculture