On 19 Sep 2008 15:23:53 GMT, Scott Seidman
wrote:

wrote in
:

On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:04:11 -0500, Ken Fortenberry
wrote:

Scott Seidman quoted:
...
Richard Steinberger of Oakdale criticized "this ill-advised and
Draconian management 'solution.' Anglers will cease to pay $20 for
four hours of unproductive fishing, revenues to the park will
diminish to a trickle, and somebody in Albany is going to suggest
the unthinkable: Change the law which established the park preserve
in order to address the revenue shortfall by enhancing 'mixed use'
recreation: picnic tables, barbecue pits, ballfields or even, God
forbid, yet another golf course."

Sounds like Tim Walker. ;-)

Fore !

Assuming this is "public" land...

Yeah, who do those "public" *******s think they are, wanting to use
"their" land for what they want instead of fishing...

Sheesh,
R


Its a state park.

http://nysparks.state.ny.us/parks/info.asp?parkID=69

I don't think there's much of a call for "mixed use", though. Lot's of
green space out there.

Um, if there is no call for it, why is anyone worried about it? OTOH,
if the majority of the public wants to use "their" land for ballfields,
barbecues, or golf courses, it would seem to be their right.

TC,
R