On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:22:14 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

On Sep 22, 11:03*am, Charlie S. w5cds (at) arrl (dot) net wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:03:43 -0700 (PDT), "

wrote:
This is Your Nation on White Privilege
* * *By Tim Wise
* * *9/13/08

snip

while if you're black

What about if you're of bi-racial...? About white folks? How about
mixed races?

and believe in reading
accused criminals and terrorists their rights (because the
Constitution, which you used to teach at a prestigious law school,
requires it), you are a dangerous and mushy liberal who isn't fit to
safeguard American institutions.

You know, last time I looked, it was NOT the Constitution that
required the reading of rights to the suspect(s), but the result of
the 1966 United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Miranda
v. Arizona.

Although I agree with some of your statements, if you expect to be
seen as literate and even knowledgeable, you might want to keep your
rantings factually correct.

You're right, Miranda is not in the US constitution, tho the principle
behind it is.

Well, that's OK - it appears to refer to Obama, so if it does, he taught
his classes that it was in there, so it probably was and someone just
erased it as a dirty trick...probably a wild pack of gay male
prostitutes hired by the GOP...

Sheesh,
R