wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:01:09 -0400, jeff miller
wrote:

wrote:
http://media.newsbusters.org/stories...acks-manhattan

With "celebs" like these, Obama doesn't need enemies...

Sheesh,
R
facinating web site too...perhaps a bit right of the birchers though,
don't you think? jeezus, she's an outrageous, shock comedienne, who
says and does some wicked stuff. that you find it meaningful in any way
is kinda humorous. imo, she and you are simply jabbing at others'
sensibilities...you for political sport, her for show (and income).

Oh, I doubt she would or could influence the election very much if at
all, but other more visible and "mainstream" celebs can and will. I
don't find her act itself particularly meaningful, I find it indicative.
And I'd offer that in many cases, the influence will be to drive more
potential voters away from the candidate the celeb's pitch seems
intended to support than folks it will convince to vote for them.

TC,
R
jeff

why search and cite the lowest of celebs and web sites in support of
your claim? heck, you've got matt damon, tommy smothers, and barbara s
to work with! G

Frankly, I think only a small percentage of voters haven't yet made up
their minds, and they are the ones who will decide this thing. I have no
frickin idea what will motivate their votes, but i won't be surprised if
it's something stupid or knee-jerk. I'm with Maher on this one - our
voters are a scary crowd of folks in their decision-making process.

jeff