On Oct 9, 10:55*pm, wrote:
*The results
are surprising...well, devastating to rabid Obamanics...


The results *ARE* surprising? Has this imaginary exercise actually
happened? Where are these alleged results? In your mind?

I, for one, do not subscribe to the 'gee, neither candidate is any
good' nihlist attitude. I think Obama is not only the better of the
two candidates, I think he is a GREAT candidate. I think his
intelligence, eloquence, charisma and rational thought are precisely
the traits that we need in the next (and did not have in the last)
POTUS. The US is in deep **** these days, and the next POTUS has to
have all of those traits in order to try to turn things around.

"Obamaniacs"...lol. What would you prefer...that we elect a president
out of a sense of national apathy? IIRC, that was how Bush got in the
second time ("its the Dems fault because they could not vet a good
candidate") and look where THAT got us.

Bush was a ****up, but the NeoCon team pumped up half of the country
to get lost in the big cheerleading frat party and got him reelected.
McCain is too senile and statistically barely stands a chance to
survive the first term, and Palin really and truly is WAY out her her
depth, and has exhibited neither the wherewithal nor the intelligence
to manage the current crisis the US is in. I'm thankful we have
someone like Obama in the race.

--riverman